— — — —— — —
×
— —— —
— — — —— — —
×
— —— —
— — — —— — —
×
— —— —
← darkroom
isn't isla 8-9 years old throughout the anime? does this make tsukasa a pedo?
The lifespan for an Android is described as roughly 8-9 years before the need to wipe memories from them. Tsukasa and Isla fall in love, but Isla is near the end of her lifespan making her about nine. This also could contribute to her small size. Thoughts? (edit: WHAT HAVE I DONE)
nice troll
no im deadass
my condolences
Technically no. Giftias are full-grown the instant they are made/manufactured (they don't age in other words, as they are reset back to full capability once they are retrieved). Isla in particular seems to be an adult Giftia of petite variety (keep in mind Giftias are meant to mimic real people, so much so that they're treated and viewed as real people. Many people who are full adults frequently appear physically similar to Isla's body type)
Not only that, but Isla in the series is treated like an adult. Meaning it is safe to assume, at least mentally, she is one.
lol
you started this.
i have started something truly immaculate
we also broke anilist in the process
you not wrong
he is tho
how shes like 9 and hes in love is this not pedophilia???
Because she’s not a child mentally nor physically, meaning that a pedophile wouldn't be attracted to her in any capacity.
sorry if im wrong, because i havent seen the anime, but she looks like a child to me and to most people man. Not to mention age wise she is literally 9 years old. In what way is she not physically and mentally a child.
- continue this thread →
I mean, no, not really. I don’t really see her as appearing like a child, she doesn’t act like a child, she has the mental capacity of an adult and she’s only “nine” in that she was an Android created nine years ago. Whether it was two years after her creation, or two hundred, she’d be the same, maturity wise.
Baby Yoda is 50 years old. Using the same logic, it is okay to date baby Yoda, since he is older than 18.
what does this have to do with isla logic? isla is 9 and looks like a little girl, baby yoda is 50 and looks like a kid. One is actually illegal and the other is legal but seriously questionable????
Isla Logic: she is not over 18, therefor not datable.
Baby Yoda logic: he is over 18 and therefore datable.So, the logic in both cases states that if the person is over 18, they are datable. The reason this logic is flawed is because this logic doesn't take life expectancy into account.
baby yoda is literally an alien and obviously I would not "date" a fucking baby alien. your argument does not work any way you look at it, you can't use aliens in your argument in saying that a child is dateable. smh all you lolicons
I mean technically speaking, it wouldn't be illegal to date baby yoda, and the law wouldn't consider you a pedophile. Sure it would be SUPER fucking weird, and I personally and most of society would consider you a weirdo, but in a legal sense you would not be a pedo. So I guess if you look at this logic from a moral standpoint you have a point, but from a legal standpoint "he is over 18 and therefore datable" is exactly correct.
- continue this thread →
But that's the thing: according to HUMAN law, it would be legal to date Baby Yoda. But in Baby Yoda's culture, he is considered a minor and you cannot date him.
You aren't comparing apples with apples. Let's say the average life expectancy of a human is 80 and the average life expectancy for a yoda-alien is 1000 years. That would mean that 18 human years is equivalent to 225 years for a yoda-alien. So, dating a yoda-alien below 225 years old should be considered illegal.
Hopefully this drives my point home.
- continue this thread →
You: lol I hope no one lets their kids around you bro
Also you: ye dating a being that's mentally and physically a child is A-Ok
If you think about the life span Giftias have, Isla is literally an old granny. So, no, Tsukasa can't be considered a pedo.
she's property she has no rights.
giftias bodies are made so, though she may look young she's actually almost the same age as the other characters
Lolicons = pedophiles
I dont make the rulesShe's not really a loli, tho
This thread is gold.
By people's usual definition of pedophilia (liking someone that is younger than 18 regardless of who they are), this is pedophilia, given the provision of a Giftia being similar enough to a human, which I think they are.
By any actually reasonable definition of pedophilia, it is not.
Tbh she looks like she’s 12, and other giftias look fully grown, unless they’re kids.. their relationship is kinda weird because why don’t they specify what her age is supposed to be but they specify Tsukasa’s, and why does she look so young. Idk maybe I’m reaching but I’m not.
