Opnion on reviving characters in anime/manga(discussion)

I have no opinions really on the general act of it. It really depends on the story

In what way it mostly damages the story's narrative for you?

It really depends, sometimes they bring a character back not because it would make sense but because people like that character and having it dead would turn off some of the viewers.
But sometimes it makes perfect sense, a great example is Berserk (spoilers ahead):

Bringing Griffith back was done as flawlessly as possible, it ties everything together, the egg of the perfect world had ate Guts' kid and now Griffith had to share the same body with Gut's son and eventually if miura hadn't passed away, Guts being torn apart by his love for his child and his hatred for Griffith would have been the biggest plot point in the story.

8-9 out of 10 times I don't like it. It's hard to mention names cause of spoilers but if you know you know. I am generally not a fan of supernatural anime or other anime that force a happy ending at the end

not the biggest fan of it. often times, reviving a character just feels like a cheap ass pull to make viewers happy. We get sad over a character death precisely because they are... dying. Sure I'd like to see my favorite characters not die, but if the cost is the plot and narrative, then I'd rather have them stay dead.

Revival of a character has to be done right, otherwise it can quickly feel like death has no consequence.

Done right: Cause a plot twist Think attack on titan where Eren is "revived"
Done wrong: Revive a character to create more seasons Reviving Lelouche from Code Geass, especially after his death was done so well.

90% of the time it is just stupid and makes me not care what happens to that character or other characters. example jojo part 3

Other anime/manga: reviving means good time.
Gantz, Berserk, Re Zero:

I really hate it when a character death seems meaningful and they decide to be like "nope". A great example would be:
Tokyo Ghoul and how they revived so many characters in a way. Really hated the Tooru "revival"

Surely is purely dependent on context? No general distaste towards the concept at all.

Most of the time it is not done well. When characters die, let them die.

If it's a "rough world" with serious tone story it's crap same as characters not dying as it feels cheap and lack of sacrifice. If it is a chill anime that doesn't take it too seriously it's okay, unless they do it so much that ot no longer means anything to die...

No trope is bad, the way it is applied it is what will make it great, good or bad. Of course this will also depend on each personal taste too.

Not a fan of them. I don't really like that kind of cliche. I won't say It third-rate though

it's fine if it's established early on that it's possible. feels contrived otherwise

If it is something previously explored in the series e.g : it has happened in the past from the series' power system

^ should this be the case then it dosent really bother me but if its some outta pocket revive then itll annoy me but i wont really drop the series

I don't know. I'm not harsh about it. If it helps with progressing the story, then I have no problem with it.

Can be done very well but feels like bs most of the time